|
Post by Suzi on Aug 4, 2005 4:45:52 GMT -5
I have another theory why Snape is innocent. Credit for this theory goes to Samantha.
I quote from her: "he had just killed the only person in the order who had ever trusted him which must have taken a lot of guts. "
This is in reference to the part where Harry calls Snape a coward and he yells.
"CALL ME A COWARD!"
Isn't it unlike Severus Snape to react so violently to a taunt from Harry. Usually he would sneer and make some insulting comment about James Potter and say how Harry was just like him.
Isn't this proof that Snape hadn't wanted to kill Dumbledore, and had been distraught that he had had to kill the one person that had truely trusted him?
|
|
|
Post by Samantha on Aug 4, 2005 4:50:20 GMT -5
Oh adding onto that, the bit where you said he usually taunts Harry, he does that as well, the first time Harry calls him a coward.
"Fight back!" Harry screamed at him. "Fight back you cowardly - " "Coward did you call me Potter?" shouted Snape "Your father would never attack me unless it was four on one, what would you call him, I wonder?" - page 562
I think that Snape is innocent because if he wasn't, why in all of the over five books did he keep saving Harry's life?
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Aug 4, 2005 4:52:08 GMT -5
yeah, it seems to be something he's really touchy about.
Yeah same here. I'm sure he's innocent
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 4, 2005 8:15:47 GMT -5
He just has to be. Lol. After OotP I had just started trusting him.
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Aug 4, 2005 8:18:30 GMT -5
Me too. He could actually be quite a good character underneath. I think perhaps he will save Harry and that will make him like him more.
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 4, 2005 8:20:34 GMT -5
That'd be cool. Or he'll die to save Harry's life. In the movies he jumped in front of the trio when Lupos attacked them (as a werewolfe of course). That was sweet!
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Aug 4, 2005 8:23:05 GMT -5
haha yeah it was.
That would be cool too. He'd die a hero
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 4, 2005 9:27:15 GMT -5
That would be the best.
|
|
|
Post by Samantha on Aug 4, 2005 10:59:38 GMT -5
Also i read on hp-lexicon.org in an interview with JKR they asked her why did she have Quirrel as the bad guy and not Snape? and she said because she knew Snape and knew he wasn't like that. (or it was something along those lines)
-looks innocent- No i don't believe i actually believed that...
|
|
|
Post by firehawk on Aug 4, 2005 22:29:34 GMT -5
I think he is innocent as many reasons other poeple have sai. before, especially him saving harry so many times in his life.
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 5, 2005 7:42:54 GMT -5
Yeah but there is that little fact that he had to do that, so that Voldemort could have some of Harry's blood, if he was able to resurrect...
|
|
|
Post by Samantha on Aug 6, 2005 11:39:21 GMT -5
But then if he really hated Harry would he have not just taken him straight to Voldemort? Eh, whatever, lol
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 14, 2005 10:04:29 GMT -5
I'm lost.
|
|