|
|
Post by Suzi on Jul 30, 2005 15:20:30 GMT -5
I think the last horcrux is Harry. He has many similarities to Voldemort and his parents death was significant enough for Voldemort to want to make a horcrux. I don't think Voldemort tried to kill Harry at all. He simply made a Horcrux of him. He heard the prophecy and this way, he has guarenteed that he is safe from Harry. Harry is the one that has the power to kill him, but we know Horcruxes must be destroyed before the person can be killed. Harry will have to die before Voldemort can be killed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ginevra on Jul 31, 2005 4:04:53 GMT -5
That is a very good theory, Suzi. You may be right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Jul 31, 2005 4:32:00 GMT -5
In a way I hope not, but I think it makes sense
|
|
|
|
Post by Ginevra on Jul 31, 2005 4:47:00 GMT -5
I get what you mean.
|
|
|
|
Post by robbie on Jul 31, 2005 9:03:54 GMT -5
that is a pretty good theory,though if harry is a Horcrux,and he is not destined to kill voldemort,and if dumbledore is really dead,who then is supposed to stop voldemort's seventh piece of his soul?
|
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Jul 31, 2005 9:12:24 GMT -5
I'm thinking that over.
I think that the prophecy means Harry is the only one with the power to kill him because while Harry live, Voldemort does too. If Harry dies then anyone can kill him if they are a good enough witch or wizard
|
|
|
|
Post by Ginevra on Jul 31, 2005 9:15:45 GMT -5
Wow! You have a great imagination, Suzi
|
|
|
|
Post by robbie on Jul 31, 2005 10:54:06 GMT -5
and another thing,how can harry or anyone kill him without using the unforgiveable Avada Kedavra Curse.?
|
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Jul 31, 2005 14:20:30 GMT -5
They couldn't, but I think in the case of Voldemort, they would not be punished for breaking the law.
|
|
|
|
Post by robbie on Jul 31, 2005 16:43:08 GMT -5
thats probably true,considering it is self defense,and im sure the ministry would be able to figure out if someone used a unforgiveable curse to defend themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by nielo on Aug 1, 2005 7:09:51 GMT -5
 So Dumbledore's death was in vain?!?  |
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Aug 1, 2005 14:31:16 GMT -5
I don't know. What was the reasoning behind his death?
|
|
|
|
Post by Samantha on Aug 2, 2005 4:59:49 GMT -5
I think that Dumbledore died because it gives JKR more power to change Harry's seventh year so he didn't have to go to Hogwarts, if Dumbledore was alive then it would have been harder for Harry to not go back to Hogwarts and so therefore harder to finish her story. Meh. that's just my theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suzi on Aug 2, 2005 6:04:00 GMT -5
Good theory, but I think there's some other reason behind Dumbledore dieing.
|
|
<-- Lol. 
Thanx everyone. ;D
